The American led vision that the establishment of a "democratic", non-hostile, and free market oriented state in Iraq and the prevention of the Taliban return in the south of Afghanistan are critical to both regional and international stability.
Versus
The bin Laden vision that a dramatic attack in the USA would result in American military involvement in Afghanistan (and elsewhere in the ME) which will show to the Muslim world in a wired era the brutality and anti-Muslim hatred of the Western "crusaders" which would undermine the Muslim people's support, not only of the West, but more importantly, of the West’s Arab partners in Saudi Arabia and in other Muslim states.
Which vision is winning?
Ted Koppel’s Washington Post Op Ed of 9/12/10 is most insightful on this issue.
Nine years after 9/11, let's stop playing into bin Laden's hands
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/09/AR2010090904735_pf.html
The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, succeeded far beyond anything Osama bin Laden could possibly have envisioned. This is not just because they resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths, nor only because they struck at the heart of American financial and military power. Those outcomes were only the bait; it would remain for the United States to spring the trap.
The goal of any organized terrorist attack is to goad a vastly more powerful enemy into an excessive response. And over the past nine years, the United States has blundered into the 9/11 snare with one overreaction after another. Bin Laden deserves to be the object of our hostility, national anguish and contempt, and he deserves to be taken seriously as a canny tactician. But much of what he has achieved we have done, and continue to do, to ourselves. Bin Laden does not deserve that we, even inadvertently, fulfill so many of his unimagined dreams.
No comments:
Post a Comment